The Longbow Papers

Link to Main Blog Page
 

Wednesday, February 09, 2005

While Bush Fiddles With Fascism at Home, Unthinkable Dangers Lie Ahead Elsewhere

Perhaps the reason Bush's North Korean policy has failed so miserably is that he doesn't really "loathe" the Dear Leader, Kim Jong Il, as he so famously proclaimed he did at the beginning of his reign over the United States of America four very long years ago. If imitation is indeed the most sincere form of flattery, then the notion above is further buttressed by Bush's aping of the North Korean dictator's attitude towards free speech and political opposition.

Whatever the reason, under Bush's watch, North Korea has become the most dangerous elephant in the living room of the world's major nations. Think not? Read Nicholas Kristof's column in today's The New York Times; it is reproduced in full below:
There are two words the Bush administration doesn't want you to think about: North Korea.

That's because the most dangerous failure of U.S. policy these days is in North Korea. President Bush has been startlingly passive as North Korea has begun churning out nuclear weapons like hot cakes.

The dangers were underscored with last week's reports that the uranium in Libya's former nuclear program may have come from North Korea. Indeed, Mr. Bush seems to recognize that his policy has failed - that's why he isn't talking much about North Korea now, at least publicly, and why (as reported in The Times today) he sent an emissary to talk last week with the Chinese leader, Hu Jintao, about how to tame North Korea.

North Korea is particularly awkward for Mr. Bush to discuss publicly because, as best we know, it didn't make a single nuclear weapon during Bill Clinton's eight years in office (although it did begin a separate, and secret, track to produce uranium weapons; it hasn't produced any yet but may eventually). In contrast, the administration now acknowledges that North Korea extracted enough plutonium in the last two years for about half a dozen nuclear weapons.

In fairness, Mr. Bush is paralyzed only because the alternatives are dreadful. A military strike on North Korea's nuclear sites might have been an option in the early 1990's, but today we don't know where the plutonium and the uranium are kept, so a military strike might accomplish little - but trigger a new Korean war. To fill the time, Mr. Bush has pursued six-party talks involving North Korea, but they have gotten nowhere.

So what would work?

The other option is the path that Richard Nixon pursued with Maoist China: resolute engagement, leading toward a new "grand bargain" in which Kim Jong Il would give up his nuclear program in exchange for political and economic ties with the international community. This has the advantage that the best bet to bring down Mr. Kim, the Dear Leader, isn't isolation, but contacts with the outside world.

A terrific new book on North Korea, "Under the Loving Care of the Fatherly Leader" by Bradley Martin, underscores how those few glimpses that North Koreans have had of the outside world - by working in logging camps in Russia or sneaking trips to China - have helped undermine Mr. Kim's rule. Yet Westerners have in effect cooperated with him by helping to keep his borders sealed.

At least China and South Korea have a strategy to transform North Korea: encourage capitalism, markets and foreign investment. Chinese traders, cellphones and radios are already widespread in the border areas, and they are doing more to weaken the Dear Leader than anything Mr. Bush is doing.

North Korea is the eeriest and most totalitarian country I've ever visited, making even Saddam Hussein's Iraq seem normal by comparison. I realized how regimented the entire country was when I stopped two girls randomly on the street for an interview on a 1989 trip and the girls started praising their leaders - reciting identical lines in perfect unison.

In his new book, Mr. Martin tells the story of how one of the Dear Leader's assistants, while drunk, told his wife about his boss's womanizing. The wife, apparently a true believer in the North Korean system, was shocked and wrote a letter to the leadership to protest this immorality.

The Dear Leader had the woman brought to him, then denounced her before a crowd and ordered her shot. At that point, her husband begged to be allowed to kill her. Graciously acceding, Mr. Kim handed him a gun to kill his own wife.

So this is a regime that is not just menacing, but monstrous. Mr. Bush is right to regard it with loathing. But U.S. policy on North Korea for the last four years has only strengthened Mr. Kim and allowed him to expand his nuclear arsenal severalfold.

The risk is that Mr. Bush will respond to the failure of his first term's policy by adopting an even harder line in the coming months, seeking Security Council sanctions (he won't get them) and ultimately imposing some kind of naval quarantine. That would only strengthen Mr. Kim's grip on power, as well as risk a war on the Korean peninsula. A Pentagon study in the 1990's predicted that such a war could kill one million people.

In short, our mishandling of North Korea has been appalling - and it may soon get worse.
The New York Times
 


3:49 PM / Editor / permalink    4 comments

Links to this post:

4 Comments:

As a student, I've heard the problem between US and Korea for a long time.In my view, holding the nuclear weapon, in some measure,is holding the lives of the world.North Korean's movement menaced the interest of the United of States.therefore,Bush had to take some measures to prevent his development of nuclear weapon.however, it is easy to mishandle the issue in Bush's way.every country should take his duty to keep this world peace without hegemonism.

By Blogger Shirley, at 11:56 PM  

Dear Shirley,

Obviously, you are a very good student. I could not agree more. Thank you for visiting The LongBow Papers and taking the time to leave a comment.

Joseph

By Blogger Joseph, at 8:50 AM  

I am always bemused (if not a little disheartened) by academics who so freely bandy about words like "fascism" to describe an American presidency. It reveals a lot about their real sympathies and by that I mean an ideological agenda disguised as genuine and legitimate public concern.

Having lived in fascist states, including China, I'm surprised that anyone else could do the same and not recognize the obvious differences between, say, a Bush Administration and a Hu Administration. But then leftists have never quite admitted to themselves much less their audiences that socialism's inevitable result is fascism to the same degree as reactionary conservatism.

Kristof, a liberal, and Moses, a liberal and Clinton apologist, would have us believe that the Bush Administration's failings with the DPRK are at least as deep and wide as Clinton's. Really, now, are we to believe that appeasing and being duped by the North Koreans was a better foreign policy direction?

Even the anti-Bush East Asian historian Bruce Cummings of the University of Chicago acknowledges the dire shortcomings of the Clinton dealings with the DPRK and even suggests that his administration reneged on assurances to build a nuclear power plant.

By Blogger Rick, at 6:22 PM  

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Blogger Rick, at 6:23 PM  

Post a Comment




The LongBow Papers at Blogged Blog Directory - Blogged
Home Page
The Time of My Life
Read Joseph Bosco
Website for Students
Email Joseph Bosco
WOW: We Observe the World
Previous Posts

'It's Fun to Shoot Some People' Marine General Say...
WOW Takes on the Zhao Yan Case
A Peggy Noonan Must Read--I Kid You Not
Andrew Sullivan Is Singing the Praises of Senator ...
Two Excellent Obituaries For Zhao Ziyang
Zhao Ziyang Funeral and Memorial Sevice: Three Per...
The Party Has Spoken: Zhao Ziyang Will Have a Publ...
Is the Party Listening? Or is it Just Part of a Ma...
Give Them Liberty (Made in the USA), Or Give Them ...
He Lived In Interesting Times; Partly Because of I...


Featured Articles
A Moment In Beijing
Twin Giants of Asia
Free Floating RMB
Mississippi Sorrows
Coming Full Cycle in
the Taiwan Strait





 

 
 
     


Site Meter