The Longbow Papers

Link to Main Blog Page
 

Wednesday, September 15, 2004

Accurate Fakes...uh, Come Again?

The peculiar saga derisively referred to in the blogosphere as "RatherGate" took a truly bizarre turn today. The woman who typed Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian's memos back in 1972, says the sentiments expressed about Mr. bush in the "memos" broadcast on "60 Minutes" are accurate but that they were not typed by her. Folks, this is turning into one of the rousing best stories going; forget the news value, this is novel or movie territory! In the right hands, a story following the paths of the actual damaging memos typed by Marian Carr Knox for her boss in 1972, to the appearance of the "memos" on CBS this week would be better than the "Da Vinci Code"!

I must make a quick personal observation: I have admired Dan Rather for many years; my only personal relationship with him was brief and it came during the O.J. Simpson criminal trial when I was featured on the CBS Evening News with Dan Rather in a series of segments then running called "Eye on America." As a journalist I believe his ethics are above reproach.

He and I have disagreed for years on one issue: what he believes he saw and heard that awful day in Dallas, Texas, November 22, 1963, the Kennedy assassination. I have never believed the "Magic Bullet" theory; he is adamant still that one bullet took some miraculous turns and entered and exited both President Kennedy and Governor Connolly--the governor twice!

Dan Rather, from southeast Texas, which is much more like Louisiana and Mississippi than it is Texas, is incapable of reporting a lie. He is capable of making a mistake. We all are. However, I will stack his credibility up against any living journalist in America, period. That's the end of that story.

The "Magic Memos" story is another matter entirely. Please read the excerpts below from The New York Times, and have some fun playing novelist:
HOUSTON, Sept. 14 - The secretary for the squadron commander purported to be the author of now-disputed memorandums questioning President Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard said Tuesday that she never typed the documents and believed that they are fakes.

But she also said they accurately reflect the thoughts of the commander, Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, and other memorandums she typed for him about Mr. Bush. "The information in them is correct," the woman, Marian Carr Knox, now 86, said in an interview at her home here. "But I doubt,'' she said, pausing, "it's not anything that I wrote because there are terms in there that are not used by Guards, the format wasn't the way we did it. It looks like someone may have read the originals and put that together."

"We did discuss Bush's conduct and it was a problem Killian was concerned about," Mrs. Knox said. "I think he was writing the memos so there would be some record that he was aware of what was going on and what he had done." But, she said, words like "billets," which appear in the memorandums, were not standard Guard terms.

Mrs. Knox, who was the secretary for the squadron at Ellington Air Force Base from 1957 to 1979, said she recalled Mr. Bush's case and the criticism of him because his record was so unusual. Mr. Killian had her type memorandums recording the problems, she said, and he kept them in a private file under lock and key. She said she had never voted for Mr. Bush because she disliked his record in office. ...

CBS has refused to say how it obtained the documents. But one person at CBS, who spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed a report in Newsweek that Bill Burkett, a retired National Guard officer who has charged that senior aides to then-Governor Bush had ordered Guard officials to remove damaging information from Mr. Bush's military personnel files, had been a source of the report. This person did not know the exact role he played.

Mr. Burkett declined to return telephone calls to his home near Abilene, Tex. His lawyer, David Van Os, on Tuesday repeatedly refused to say in a telephone interview whether the officer had played a part in supplying the disputed documents to CBS. Mr. Van Os said "the real story is and should be, where was George Bush?" and that Mr. Burkett "is not the proper object of attention."

Mr. Van Os called Mr. Burkett "a man of impeccable honesty who would not permit himself to be a party to anything fake, fraudulent or phony." He also said, in response to questions, and stressing that he was speaking only hypothetically, "If Bill Burkett were to later discover that something he was a party to were fake or phony, as a man of honor who lives by a code of honor of the military, he would not permit the falsity to continue." But, the lawyer hastened to add, "This is not intended to be any kind of specific statement."

Asked what role Mr. Burkett had in raising questions about Mr. Bush's military service, Mr. Van Os said: "If, hypothetically, Bill Burkett or anyone else, any other individual, had prepared or had typed on a word processor as some of the journalists are presuming, without much evidence, if someone in the year 2004 had prepared on a word processor replicas of documents that they believed had existed in 1972 or 1973 -- which Bill Burkett has absolutely not done'' -- then, he continued, "what difference would it make?"
The New York Times
 


3:05 PM / Editor / permalink    2 comments

Links to this post:

2 Comments:

As paper is organic, a Carbon 14 screen would be able to tell us something about these records, as would a chemical screen.

Over the past couple of decades the levels of mercury in paper has changed, along with numerous other chemicals in paper and in ink, there are more checks than I care to think of that could be done to verify the age of these records. Ink surface bleeds, micro indentations from typewriter keys, watermarks, the list goes on quite some time.

Unless I've skipped though the specific news article, there doesn’t seem to be very much will to send the Bush papers down to the local forensic science laboratory. Verifying their age based on the chemical composition is Childs play compared to what a CSI lab has to do with a kidnap note or a suspect suicide letter.

ACB

http://angrychineseblogger.blog-city.com/

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:17 PM  

ACB,

You are on-target with your forensics. That certainly would settle the matter if CBS was working with original memos. My understanding, however, is that the "memos" put on the air were several generations removed from originals.

Thank you for visiting and taking the time to leave a comment.

All the best,

Joseph

By Blogger Joseph, at 9:29 PM  

Post a Comment




The LongBow Papers at Blogged Blog Directory - Blogged
Home Page
The Time of My Life
Read Joseph Bosco
Website for Students
Email Joseph Bosco
WOW: We Observe the World
Previous Posts

The Nightmare Continues in the "Iraqi Civil War".....
It's All Part of Rove's Master Plan, Richard...
Thoughts on Blogging Priorities, China, and Simon ...
Is It Really Worse Than We Think...?
Young Republicans Display Brain-Wave Activity Sign...
Out of Control...
Forget The Vietnam Comparisons, Iraq Will Win Its ...
Heroes Come In Shades of Grey...
They Did This In Our Name
What's 1,000,000 Lost Votes Mean To A Man Whose So...


Featured Articles
A Moment In Beijing
Twin Giants of Asia
Free Floating RMB
Mississippi Sorrows
Coming Full Cycle in
the Taiwan Strait





 

 
 
     


Site Meter