The Longbow Papers

Link to Main Blog Page
 

Monday, May 10, 2004

The Whores of Babylon...and Their Pimps

How can it be that the worst national moral scandal in our nation's history happened under the administration of the most fundamentalist Christian president in its history? Perhaps I should qualify the two elements of the question.

The worst moral scandal? No, Abu Ghraib is not My Lai. Rape, sexual degradation, depraved humiliation, emotional extortion, cultural demonizing, physical abuse, a fair amount of fairly routine physical torture, and two or three murders do not equal the massacre of scores of Vietnamese women and children. Abu Ghraib is not equal to the Black Holocaust, with its shameful enslaving, flogging, raping, lynching and tormenting of millions of African-Americans over three centuries. Abu Ghraib is also not equivalent to the systematic annihilation of unknown millions of Native Americans over some four centuries.

But then none of those atrocities can be classified as "immoral" in the Anglo-Saxon, Judaic-Christian view of sexuality, wherein typically lies most American-Puritanical taboos. We do not have to search the two centuries of America’s existence as a nation to find Abu Ghraib’s equivalent. There is none, certainly not at the institutional level of Abu Ghraib and certainly not under the Color of Authority of the armed services of the United States of America.

The most fundamentalist Christian president? There's not even a list with which to compare George W. Bush. William Jennings Bryant would have been a match but he lost every presidential race he entered. Jimmy Carter? President Carter wasn't a born-again Christian. He lived his faith every day of his life beginning with his natural birth, evangelizing only by example, never by goody-two-shoe platitudes and never with the arrogance of a zealous "true believer."

As to the "moral" scandal, I will put it this way so as to cut to the chase: George W. Bush's majority wing of the Republican Party believes that homosexuality is a crime against nature, that it is a sickness of the soul, not a life-choice. Many still believe that it should be an actual crime, a felony that should be punished by incarceration. I could go into any number of other fundamentalist “family value" issues concerning sexuality that are pillars of the faith-based, natural-law and Bible-as-absolute-word-of-God branch of unforgiving moralists that are well known to be the overwhelming majority of the Bush electorate. But just this one issue will do.

It will suffice because, based on the photographs so far disclosed, the Abu Ghraib atrocity of conscience was thematically based upon forced and or simulated homosexual acts or poses and homoerotic naked male contact for the purpose of photographing, apparently for three uses: Intimidation to “soften up” detainees for interrogation; enhanced control over the detainees while incarcerated and afterwards, knowing they would never willingly disclose to family and friends what they had been forced to do; and as a form of voyeuristic pleasure, since we now understand that the digital photos were passed widely around for viewing by any number of American troops in Baghdad.

I can only pose the question. I do not know why a sickening level of sexual immorality happened uniquely, peculiarly during an administration that, based upon its words and record, one would think a deviant culture so at odds with the prevailing national will would not dare to flourish openly but rather seek only dark, hidden places to perpetrate such activity. But the ugliness at Abu Ghraib was just the opposite, choosing instead to be conducted not only openly, not only flagrantly, not only routinely, but it was happily, freely documented ad nauseam by digital cameras with all of the frequency of tourists at the Great Wall.

I am asking you. I am asking everyone. We need to find the answer. I believe therein might lie at least part of the solution to its eradication from the present and a preventative for its return in the future.

We can at least for the moment study the evidence, and those people who have already admitted to participation in the atrocities—how could they not when they are pictured in full digital color wherever we look these days:
There were no rules, by her account, and there was little training. But the mission was clear. Spec. Sabrina D. Harman, a military police officer who has been charged with abusing detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, said she was assigned to break down prisoners for interrogation.

"They would bring in one to several prisoners at a time already hooded and cuffed," Harman said by e-mail this week from Baghdad. "The job of the MP was to keep them awake, make it hell so they would talk."

Harman, one of seven military police reservists charged in the abuse of detainees at the prison, is the second of those soldiers to speak publicly about her time at Abu Ghraib, and her comments echo findings of the Army's investigation into prisoner abuse there. She did not discuss abusive treatment of prisoners or clarify who specifically ordered such treatment, and she referred questions about the charges against her to her attorney, who declined to comment.

Her face is now famous as belonging to one of two soldiers posing in the widely published photograph of naked Iraqi detainees stacked in a pyramid. The picture is one of several that have inflamed the Arab world and brought condemnation from President Bush and other U.S. political and military leaders.

Harman is accused by the Army of taking photographs of that pyramid and photographing and videotaping detainees who were ordered to strip and masturbate in front of other prisoners and soldiers, according to a charge sheet obtained by The Washington Post. She is also charged with photographing a corpse and then posing for a picture with it; with striking several prisoners by jumping on them as they lay in a pile; with writing "rapeist" on a prisoner's leg; and with attaching wires to a prisoner's hands while he stood on a box with his head covered. She told him he would be electrocuted if he fell off the box, the documents said.

In her e-mails, Harman said detainees would be handed over to her military police unit by Army intelligence officers, by CIA operatives or by the contractors. The Army probe into Abu Ghraib said the U.S. government used employees of private companies as interrogators and interpreters along with intelligence officers. Two of the civilian contractors are under investigation in connection with the abuses.

Prisoners were stripped, searched and then "made to stand or kneel for hours," Harman said. Sometimes they were forced to stand on boxes or hold boxes or to exercise to tire them out, she said.

"The person who brought them in would set the standards on whether or not to 'be nice,' " she said. "If the prisoner was cooperating, then the prisoner was able to keep his jumpsuit, mattress, and was allowed cigarettes on request or even hot food. But if the prisoner didn't give what they wanted, it was all taken away until [military intelligence] decided. Sleep, food, clothes, mattresses, cigarettes were all privileges and were granted with information received."

She said the prison had no standard operating procedures and on Tier 1A, where suspected insurgents were held, Army and other intelligence officers "made the rules as they went." ...
Harman, an assistant manager at a Papa John's Pizza in Fairfax County before being sent to Iraq, said the company received additional training at Fort Lee, but it was for "combat support, not I/R," the military term for internment and resettlement. She said she was never schooled in the Geneva Conventions' rules on prisoner treatment.

"The Geneva Convention was never posted, and none of us remember taking a class to review it," Harman said. "The first time reading it was two months after being charged. I read the entire thing highlighting everything the prison is in violation of. There's a lot."

Harman is charged with conspiracy, dereliction of duty, cruelty and maltreatment, making a false statement, and assault. She faces an Article 32 hearing tentatively set in June, the military equivalent of a preliminary hearing to determine whether there is enough evidence to convene a court-martial.

Harman's mother, Robin Harman, said her daughter would never hurt anyone.

"She has this . . . attitude that she is going to save the world," said Robin Harman, who lives in Northern Virginia. "She got over there and got an eye-opener. You don't put unqualified kids in that situation."

Yesterday, as Robin Harman watched Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld testify, she called her daughter a "scapegoat." "They're passing the buck, putting it all on the little kids," she said. "That's what makes me so mad."

Harman took many photographs while in Iraq, her family said.

Among hundreds of digital pictures passed around her MP unit -- and obtained by The Post -- is one taken before the soldiers got to Abu Ghraib in October. In it, Harman is smiling, crouching slightly, a thumb up, and leaning toward a blackened, decaying corpse with long fingers and a gaping mouth.

The photo was taken at a makeshift combat morgue in Al Hillah, her family said, citing letters that Harman sent with the picture.
The Washington Post

And then we have another lovely young lady who frolicked in the ancient kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar. She has been exposed the most. The lady with the Iraqi on her leash. The cigarette smoking, masturbation demonstrator. What is her story? Is there anything to be learned here?
RALEIGH, N.C. - Although relatives insist she was following orders, the military charged an Army reservist with assaulting detainees after photographs surfaced of her smiling and pointing at naked Iraqi prisoners.

Pfc. Lynndie England on Friday became the seventh member of an Army Reserve military police unit to be charged in a scandal that has drawn outrage around the world and damaged the reputation of the United States as it tries to stabilize Iraq.

England 21, faces four allegations, according to a statement from the XVIII Airborne Corps at Fort Bragg.

She is accused of assaulting Iraqi detainees on multiple occasions; conspiring with another soldier, Spc. Charles Graner, to mistreat the prisoners; committing an indecent act; and committing acts "that were prejudicial to good order and discipline and were of nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces through her mistreatment of Iraqi detainees." ...

In photographs that have been shown repeatedly in news reports, England is seen smiling, cigarette in her mouth, as she leans forward and points at the genitals of a naked, hooded Iraqi.

Another photo shows her holding a leash that encircles the neck of a naked Iraqi man lying on his side on a cellblock floor, his face contorted. ...

Both England and Graner were members of the Army Reserve's 372nd Military Police Company, based in Cumberland, Md. Graner's attorney has said he faces a possible court-martial on criminal charges of maltreatment and indecent acts.

England's family said she is pregnant with Graner's child.
The Washington Post

And here is the story of the soldier who with the help of his father pimped his way onto "60 Minutes II" with the picture proof that rocked the world and shocked a nation. It is also the story of a soldier with a "good" side and a "bad" side:
CUMBERLAND, Md., May 7 -- Ivan Frederick was distraught. His son, an Army reservist turned prison guard in Iraq, was under investigation earlier this year for mistreating prisoners, and photographs of the abuse were beginning to circulate among soldiers and military investigators.

So the father went to his brother-in-law, William Lawson, who was afraid that reservists like his nephew would end up taking the fall for what he considered command lapses, Mr. Lawson recounted in an interview on Friday. He knew whom to turn to: David Hackworth, a retired colonel and a muckraker who was always willing to take on the military establishment. Mr. Lawson sent an e-mail message in March to Mr. Hackworth's Web site and got a call back from an associate there in minutes, he said.

That e-mail message would put Mr. Lawson in touch with the CBS News program "60 Minutes II" and help set in motion events that led to the public disclosure of the graphic photographs and an international crisis for the Bush administration. ...

The irony, Mr. Lawson said, is that the public spectacle might have been avoided if the military and the federal government had been responsive to his claims that his nephew was simply following orders. Mr. Lawson said he sent letters to 17 members of Congress about the case earlier this year, with virtually no response, and that he ultimately contacted Mr. Hackworth's Web site out of frustration, leading him to cooperate with a consultant for "60 Minutes II."

"The Army had the opportunity for this not to come out, not to be on 60 Minutes," he said. "But the Army decided to prosecute those six G.I.'s because they thought me and my family were a bunch of poor, dirt people who could not do anything about it. But unfortunately, that was not the case." ...

But there are still numerous unresolved questions about the photographs. One is why they were taken. Some officials suggest that soldiers wanted the photographs as souvenirs, but some relatives said they believed that the photographs were going to be shown to other prisoners to pressure their cooperation.
Then there is the question of how the photographs became public.

Lt. Gen. Lance Smith, deputy commander of forces in the region, testifying Friday before Congress, said he was still unclear how that happened. "It was a surprise that it got out," General Smith said.

Military officials were aware of two disks with photographs on them that were part of continuing investigations, one in Iraq and another in Washington, he said.

"That was the limit of the pictures, and we thought we had them all," General Smith said.

Producers at "60 Minutes II" are not saying exactly how they got the photographs. But Jeff Fager, the executive producer, said, "We heard about someone who was outraged about it and thought that the public should know about it." ...

Officials said that the photographs showing psychological or physical abuse numbered in the hundreds, perhaps more than 1,000, with Mr. Rumsfeld hinting Friday that more may come out.

Among some prison personnel in Iraq, the photographs were apparently an open secret. "Some soldiers in Iraq had them — I'm hearing that soldiers were showing them to everybody," Mr. Lawson said. He said he did not have the original photos and did not turn them over to anyone.

The photographs have now turned soldiers like Mr. Lawson's nephew, Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick, and Pfc. Lynndie R. England into graphic symbols of military abuse. But for Mr. Lawson, they are evidence of a complete breakdown in training and authority in the Iraqi prison system.

He shared his frustration in his March 23 e-mail message to Mr. Hackworth's Web site, writing: "We have contacted the Red Cross, Congress both parties, Bill O'Reilly and many others. Nobody wants to touch this."

Less than five weeks later, images of his nephew — interviewed on "60 Minutes II" with Mr. Lawson's help — would be shown around the world. Far from untouchable, the story would become unavoidable.
The New York Times

 


11:14 AM / Editor / permalink   



The LongBow Papers at Blogged Blog Directory - Blogged
Home Page
The Time of My Life
Read Joseph Bosco
Website for Students
Email Joseph Bosco
WOW: We Observe the World
Previous Posts

A Shooter Explains...
Human Rights Record Costs China EU Deal
Detainees Were Shot And Killed From Watchtowers At...
My Turn...
Has The Real Christopher Hitchens Been Spurred To ...
Be Careful What You Say, You May Have To Taste Tho...
There Are Some Words A Bush Just Cannot Say
The Red Cross Aware Of Conditions, But Were Stonew...
The Right Wing Apologists For Perversity Ask: "Whe...
Will Rummy Have To Leave The Pentagon Running?


Featured Articles
A Moment In Beijing
Twin Giants of Asia
Free Floating RMB
Mississippi Sorrows
Coming Full Cycle in
the Taiwan Strait





 

 
 
     


Site Meter