The Longbow Papers

Link to Main Blog Page
 

Monday, May 24, 2004

Is General Sanchez Involved in Abu Ghraib "Up to his Ears"?

The Abu Ghraib scandal is spreading faster than a Southern California brush fire. According to The Washington Post, in a hearing back in April, well before the photos went public on CBS, an army attorney, as an officer of the court, stated for the record, that an officer he was assigned to defend in the abuse case, if granted immunity from prosecution, would testify that General Sanchez himself was present at Abu Ghraib during incidents of abuse.

Disgraced General Janis Karpinski also places General Sanchez at the prison at precisely the time when the abuse began, on at least three occasions.
A military lawyer for a soldier charged in the Abu Ghraib abuse case stated that a captain at the prison said the highest-ranking U.S. military officer in Iraq was present during some "interrogations and/or allegations of the prisoner abuse," according to a recording of a military hearing obtained by The Washington Post. ...

During an April 2 hearing that was open to the public, Shuck said the company commander, Capt. Donald J. Reese, was prepared to testify in exchange for immunity. The military prosecutor questioned Shuck about what Reese would say under oath.

"Are you saying that Captain Reese is going to testify that General Sanchez was there and saw this going on?" asked Capt. John McCabe, the military prosecutor.

"That's what he told me," Shuck said. "I am an officer of the court, sir, and I would not lie. I have got two children at home. I'm not going to risk my career." ...

Sanchez visited the 205th Military Intelligence Brigade's operation, which encompassed Tier 1A at Abu Ghraib, at least three times in October, according to Brig. Gen. Janis L. Karpinski, who was in charge of U.S. detention facilities in Iraq as commander of the 800th Military Police Brigade. That month, the serious abuses documented in published photographs -- naked detainees shackled together, a guard posing with a prisoner on a dog leash -- began.

In an interview yesterday, Karpinski said the number of visits by a commanding general struck her as "unusual," especially because Sanchez had not visited several of the 15 other U.S. detention facilities in Iraq. ...

The general, a reservist from South Carolina, said she was not present during Sanchez's visits because her brigade had surrendered authority over that part of the prison to intelligence officers. She said she was alerted as a courtesy while the three-star general was planning to travel to the prison. Karpinski added that Sanchez might have visited without her knowledge after the intelligence officers were given formal authority over the entire prison on Nov. 19.

"He has divisions all over Iraq, and he has time to visit Abu Ghraib three times in a month?" Karpinski asked yesterday. "Why was he going out there so often? Did he know that something was going on?" ...

"I think General Miller's visit gave them ideas, inspired them, gave them plans, told them what they were succeeding with in Gitmo," Karpinski said. She added that intelligence officers were "under great pressure to get more actionable intelligence from those interrogations."

Karpinski said she believes that intelligence officers were central to the abuses because the MPs arrived in mid-October at the prison, just weeks before serious abuses began. The general also said she believes officers in the military intelligence chain of command knew what was going on, and that Sanchez later tried to shift the blame to her unit, in January, after an MP reported the abuse and provided photos to military investigators.

"I didn't know then what [Sanchez] probably knew, which was that this was something clearly in the MI, maybe that he endorsed, and he was already starting a campaign to stay out of the fray and blame the 800th," Karpinski said. "I think the MI people were in this all the way. I think they were up to their ears in it. . . . I don't believe that the MPs, two weeks onto the job, would have been such willing participants, even with instructions, unless someone had told them it was all okay."
The Washington Post
 


12:44 AM / Editor / permalink    2 comments

Links to this post:

2 Comments:

It looks like another "he said/she said" situation. One thing's for certain and that's that someone is lying. I'll put my money on Sanchez (i.e., I think he's the one who's lying).

By Blogger richard, at 3:51 AM  

Richard,

Yes, I'm almost certain of it. I think there is a lot of lying going on. And it goes at least as high as the Deputy Secretary of Defence level. Those low-life guards would not have come up with the theme of the abuse and the photographing on their own. Beatings and routine physical abuse yes, I'm sorry to say.

By Blogger Joseph, at 10:52 AM  

Post a Comment




The LongBow Papers at Blogged Blog Directory - Blogged
Home Page
The Time of My Life
Read Joseph Bosco
Website for Students
Email Joseph Bosco
WOW: We Observe the World
Previous Posts

Bay of Goats...?
Gone To Xi'an...
The Army Brought Down McCarthy, Will It Bring Down...
Dubya, Is It Time To Sing "Turn Out The Lights, Th...
Dubya, The Wastrel Son
Do You Think Dubya Has The Smarts To Know It's End...
Fickle or Feckless?
A Brief History Of The Atrocities Of War
There Are No Oopsies In Preventative War
Biden Wants McCain On Democratic Ticket


Featured Articles
A Moment In Beijing
Twin Giants of Asia
Free Floating RMB
Mississippi Sorrows
Coming Full Cycle in
the Taiwan Strait





 

 
 
     


Site Meter